Custom Search
NO FENCE SITTERS ON WALL STREET // EITHER YOU ARE A REBEL OR A SLAVE
For those few unable to make up their minds, let me provide a clarification.
Yes, you can go on being a loyal servant of the Federal Government and the Federal Reserve. You can work your life away trying to earn money to pay the debts of a system designed to produce more debt than money, month after month, year after year, including the lives of your children and grandchildren.
And after all that sacrifice, and the government even deeper in debt than you began, what would you have?
Debt.
And life under a government that spies on you, erodes your civil rights, reads your email, loots your computers, tracks your every move, works to keep you dependent both emotionally and physically, indeed works to keep you a mental slave because they fear you and the possibility that you might say "no" at some point in the future.
In other words, working yourself to death only buys you more of the life you have now. And that pretty much sucks.
On the other hand, I think that most of us, were we to be honest about it, would agree that our lives would be tremendously improved were the US Government together with Wall Street, were to vanish from the face of the Earth, taking with it the huge manufactured debt used to enslave us, along with the tendency to regard the American people as the wallet of last resort when funding wars, Israel, or saving Wall Street from going to jail for the biggest financial swindle in history, not to mention the vast cloud of laws and regulations that serve no purpose but to keep us distracted with reams of official forms we have to deal with.
It is simple.
Revolution equals a better life.
Continued servitude to Wall Street DC equals ... continued servitude to Wall Street DC!
Any questions?
Mike Rivero
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
This charge refers to additional customs officials and courts of admiralty--that is, military and not civil courts--established by the British government in the colonies, in an effort to enforce trade laws and prevent smuggling. Since none of these officials were approved by the colonial legislatures, they were illegitimate.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.(4)
Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [securing man's unalienable rights, from propositions 2-4], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it.
When government deliberately seeks to reduce the people under absolute despotism, the people have a right, indeed a duty, to alter or abolish that form of government and to create new guards for their future security.
The government of the United States has deliberately sought to reduce the American people under absolute despotism.
Therefore the American people have a right, indeed a duty, to abolish their present form of government and to create new guards for their future security.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the United States Federal Criminal Cabal, and that all political connection between them and the United States Federal Criminal Cabal, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
The history of the present United States Federal Criminal Cabal is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these states.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
the fact is that the American Revolution was, at its core, a case of people revolting against unrestrained corporate power. The corporate giant against which we revolted as the East India Company.
I shall therefore conclude with a proposal that your watchmen be instructed as they go on their rounds, to call out every night, half-past twelve, “Beware of the East India Company.” – Pamphlet signed by “Rusticus” 1773
The taste of life under the East India Company was still bitter in the mouths of many of the Founders after they had thrown off both the corporation and the Crown that had created and supported it — so much so that Jefferson repeatedly insisted that the freedom from monopoly be added to the Constitution in the Bill of Rights.
I will tell you what I do not like. First, the omission of a bill of rights, providing clearly, and without the aide of sophism, for freedom of religion, freedom of the press, protection against standing armies,restriction of monopolies... — Thomas Jefferson writing to James Madison in 1787 about is concerns with the Constitution.
“By a declaration of rights, I mean one which shall stipulate freedom of religion, freedom of the press,freedom of commerce against monopolies…. These are letters against doing evil, which no honest government should decline. — Thomas Jefferson, Feb. 7, 1788.
Jefferson tirelessly argued for an amendment that would prevent companies from growing so big that they could dominate an industry or have power to influence the government.
“With respect to the new government… others may oppose it. Virginia, I think, will be of this number. Besides other objections of less moment, she (Virginia) will insist on annexing a bill of rights to the new Constitution, i.e., a bill wherein the government shall declare that, 1. Religion shall be free; 2. Printing press free; 3, Trials by jury preserved in all cases; 4. No monopolies in commerce…. — Thomas Jefferson, Feb. 12, 1788
I sincerely rejoice at the acceptance of our new constitution by nine states. It is a good canvass, on which some strokes only want retouching…. It seems generally understood that this should go to juries, habeas corpus, standing armies, printing, religion, and monopolies. – Thomas Jefferson writing to James Madison, July 1, 1788
What I disapproved from the first moment also, was the want of a bill of rights… to secure freedom in religion, freedom of the press, freedom from monopolies, freedom from unlawful imprisonment, freedom from a permanent military, and a trial by jury, in all cases determinable by the laws of the land. — Thomas Jefferson, March 13, 1789
The Federalists fought hard, and successfully, to keep the “freedom from monopolies” out of the Constitution, but the concern over the corrupting, destructive influence of big business and the super rich did not go away.
In this point of the case the question is distinctly presented whether the people of the United States are to govern through representatives chosen by their unbiased suffrages or whether the money and power of a great corporation are to be secretly exerted to influence their judgment and control their decisions. – President Andrew Jackson, 1833
I am more than ever convinced of the dangers to which the free and unbiased exercise of political opinion – the only sure foundation and safeguard of (our) government — would be exposed by any further increase of the already overgrown influence of corporate authorities. — President Martin Van Buren, 1837
It has indeed been a trying hour for the Republic; but I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless. — President Abraham Lincoln, 1864
“(There) is looming up a new and dark power… the enterprises of the country are aggregating vast corporate combinations of unexampled capital, boldly marching, not for economical conquests only, but for political power…. The question will arise and arise in your day, though perhaps not fully in mine, which shall rule — wealth or man (sic); which shall lead — money or intellect; who shall fill public stations — educated and patriotic freemen, or the feudal serfs of corporate capital… — Edward Ryan, chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in an address to the University of Wisconsin Law School’s graduating class of 1873
From: Rod Remelin - r[email protected]